CreativeMornings/Berlin Interview â Klemens Sitzmann on NOMAD
Reflecting on the August theme, Iâve come to see that NOMAD speaks differently to each person and the term evolved over time in modern contexts. For some is a deliberate choiceâa way of designing both life and work, staying creative on the road, but is also a mindset, exploring your own city in a new way.
This week, weâre back with our regular monthly talk, and weâre excited to welcome Klemens Sitzmann, an architect and designer based in Berlin.
Klemens answered our questions about Berlin and what a nomadic experience means to him, offering also a preview of this Fridayâs talk. He shares how he creates architectural design and art using technology in unconventional ways, turning simplicity and experimentation into innovation.
1. Klemens, when we talked at the community event last month, we both agreed that NOMAD is a great theme in August. When you hear the word nomadic, what are your first thoughts or images that come to mind?
Nomadic implies a certain sense of restlessness and independence to me. A nomad is somebody who wanders and is driven by a certain incentive to continue exploring without settling. In a way, to be hungry for more, curious about what is past the horizon and longing for the unknown. Personally, I do not see an image in front of my mental eye when I think about nomadic; it invokes a sentiment or a state of mind for me that I can very much relate to. My artistic work feels driven by restlessness and wonder. Not knowing for certain what I am aiming at or âdoingâ but driven by a force for experimentation and curiosity for what else is out there in the hidden waiting to be discovered.
2. Berlin is often considered a city in reinvention with an eclectic designâ How do you see Berlin, and does that influence your work as an architect here?
Berlin is many things, but not a city known for the quality of design. Architecturally, even less so. For me, the beauty of Berlin lies in the opposite of the âfinal designâ. It is a city where, along a 20min bikeride, one can see pretty much every type of city development which has existed in the last 150 years. I think the strength and quality of Berlin lies in its weirdness. I often think of it as a half-finished city for half-finished people. It is very easy to feel at home here and to âfit inâ, because at the end of the day everybody can be who and whatever they wanna be without being afraid to be judged. Berlinâs influence is not in its openly visible parts, I would say.
The techno and club culture definitely had a strong influence on my artworks. The hardness and rawness of material and geometry, the machinistic repetition definitely left its mark. Reflecting back, I don’t see certain works being made in this look and feel if I had lived in another city.
Architecturally, I look everywhere else but Berlin for inspiration. Berlin still has so much space in the center of the city. No other capital in Europe has that much free space and potential. Sadly if you look at how the city is filling the empty lots, it is just criminal, every opportunity for new and innovative architecture gets blown out the window for the sake of cheap and dull investor developments. A disgrace, really!
3. Your talk this August is called âDebris of the Future.â How do you see the evolution of designâespecially when it comes to balancing creativity with the use of technology?
Most of my architectural design and my artworks are driven by technology alike. I would say my creativity does not come from a defined vision of what I would like to achieve, but from a sense of innovation and thinking outside the box. I leverage tools and technology to my advantage, by usually not using them in the way they were intended to be used, but to play around and experiment, trying to find ways around the center and finding workflows which result in interesting results. This is more true for my artistic work, as certain work relies mostly on computation and happy error.
I used to be quite a first mover when new software came out back in the days, I don’t know why this has changed, but I feel it turned full circle at one point. I am no user of AI or new tools; in a way, I went back to the early years of computer graphics and use tools which existed already for decades in a different way. I would not describe my work and workflow as very complex, it is quite simple in a way. I use some by now almost forgotten tools and connect them in an interesting way.
Interview conducted by Aida Mola - an economist that blends business insights with creative writing and travel notes, with a passion for both numbers and culture. Discover more at aidamola.com or connect on LinkedIn.








